Managers
Use ratios to judge whether objectives are being achieved, resources are controlled efficiently and corrective action is required.
Ratio analysis turns figures from published financial statements into evidence about liquidity, profitability, efficiency, long-term finance and shareholder returns. The most important skill is not simply calculating a ratio but interpreting it in context and using comparisons to make a supported judgement.
You should be able to calculate and interpret all prescribed ratios, explain what different stakeholders learn from them, compare results over time and against competitors or industry norms, identify limitations of ratio analysis, and suggest realistic actions that could improve a weak ratio without ignoring the possible side effects.
Ratio analysis compares one piece of accounting information with another to help stakeholders judge financial performance. Ratios make raw figures more meaningful because they express relationships: for example, profit relative to revenue, liquid assets relative to short-term debts, or dividends relative to the market price of a share.
Use ratios to judge whether objectives are being achieved, resources are controlled efficiently and corrective action is required.
May consider profitability, stability and whether the business appears able to sustain employment and pay.
Focus on profitability, long-term financial risk and the return they receive from owning shares.
Pay particular attention to liquidity, debt and whether the business is likely to meet its obligations.
Published accounts provide evidence relevant to taxation and the financial scale of the business.
Can compare margins, efficiency and financing to assess relative performance.
Days (e.g. receivables days), percentages (e.g. ROCE), times per year (e.g. inventory turnover) and a ratio (e.g. 1.5:1 current ratio). Always include the correct format in calculations.
Liquidity describes a business' ability to meet short-term obligations. A profitable business can still fail if it cannot generate enough cash to pay bills when they fall due, so liquidity matters to managers, suppliers, lenders and shareholders.
Express the answer as a ratio, for example 1.6:1.
The current ratio compares all current assets, including inventory, with current liabilities. A result of 1.6:1 means the business has $1.60 of current assets for every $1 of short-term debt.
Current assets = $480,000; current liabilities = $300,000.
Current ratio = $480,000 ÷ $300,000 = 1.6:1.
This removes inventory because inventory may take time to sell and convert into cash.
Current assets = $480,000; inventory = $150,000; current liabilities = $300,000.
Liquid assets = $480,000 − $150,000 = $330,000.
Acid test = $330,000 ÷ $300,000 = 1.10:1.
May signal difficulty paying suppliers, wages, tax or other short-term debts. But cash-based retailers can operate successfully with relatively low ratios because they receive cash rapidly from customers.
Is not automatically good. It may indicate excessive cash, slow-moving inventory or other current assets that could have been invested more productively.
The text gives around 1.6:1 as a more typical modern current ratio and notes that many businesses can operate with acid-test results near 0.7:1. The appropriate figure depends on the industry, cash cycle, inventory system, supplier relationships and stability of cash flows.
Sell non-current assets that are not needed or arrange long-term finance. This can raise current assets without adding current liabilities.
Postponing large cash outflows can preserve liquidity, although this may damage capacity or efficiency if essential investment is delayed.
Using available cash to pay short-term debts can improve the current ratio when the ratio is above 1, but it also reduces cash reserves.
Collect receivables faster and, where agreed, obtain longer credit from suppliers. This strengthens cash flow but must not damage customer or supplier relationships.
Profitability ratios compare profit with revenue or the capital available to the business. They help stakeholders judge how effectively managers convert sales and long-term finance into profit.
Capital employed = share capital + reserves + non-current liabilities.
Shows the percentage of revenue left after cost of sales.
Shows the percentage of revenue remaining after operating costs and expenses.
ROCE compares operating profit with the long-term finance committed to the business. It is particularly useful for comparing performance over time or with businesses in the same industry and for considering whether the return justifies the capital tied up.
Operating profit = $720,000; capital employed = $3,000,000.
ROCE = ($720,000 ÷ $3,000,000) × 100 = 24%.
A useful next step is to compare 24% with the business' previous ROCE, competitors and the return available from alternative uses of capital.
Revenue = $5,000,000; gross profit = $2,000,000; operating profit = $650,000.
Gross profit margin = $2,000,000 ÷ $5,000,000 × 100 = 40%.
Operating profit margin = $650,000 ÷ $5,000,000 × 100 = 13%.
Suggests cost of sales and pricing have not changed dramatically relative to revenue.
If gross margin is stable but operating margin falls, operating expenses may be rising or being controlled poorly.
A business can earn a larger absolute profit while becoming less profitable relative to sales or capital. For example, expansion can increase total profit but require such a large increase in capital employed that ROCE falls.
Can raise margins if costs do not rise by as much. But if demand is price elastic, sales volume and total profit could fall.
Lower input costs, waste or operating expenses can improve margins, provided quality, customer service or long-term capability are not harmed.
Selling more high-margin products can increase overall margins, even if total revenue does not rise substantially.
Selling unused assets or repaying long-term liabilities can improve ROCE if operating profit is maintained.
Financial efficiency ratios examine how effectively managers control inventories, customer credit and supplier credit. They are especially useful for understanding working-capital management and the cash-conversion cycle.
A higher number means inventory is sold and replaced more frequently.
A lower number of days generally means inventory moves faster.
Cost of sales = $1,460,000; average inventory = $200,000.
Times per year = $1,460,000 ÷ $200,000 = 7.3 times.
Days = $200,000 ÷ $1,460,000 × 365 = 50 days approximately.
A faster turnover can reduce storage costs and cash tied up in inventory. However, inventory that is too low can cause stock-outs, lost sales and poor customer service. Appropriate turnover varies dramatically across industries.
Shows how long customers take, on average, to pay. Cash sales should be excluded from credit sales.
Trade receivables = $180,000; annual credit sales = $1,800,000.
$180,000 ÷ $1,800,000 × 365 = 36.5 days.
Shows how long the business takes, on average, to pay suppliers. Use credit purchases rather than total cost of sales.
Trade payables = $210,000; annual credit purchases = $1,680,000.
$210,000 ÷ $1,680,000 × 365 = 45.6 days.
Cash is collected from customers in a little over five weeks.
On average, cash comes in before the business pays suppliers, which can help liquidity.
Improve forecasting, adopt suitable JIT practices, clear obsolete stock and increase sales without building unnecessary inventory.
Shorten credit terms, improve credit checks, follow up overdue accounts and use an aged-receivables analysis to target slow payers.
Negotiate longer supplier credit where possible. Simply paying late without agreement can damage trust, supply reliability and credit terms.
Reducing every working-capital figure is not automatically efficient. The objective is to maintain enough inventory and attractive credit terms while avoiding unnecessary cash being tied up.
Gearing examines the long-term financial structure of the business by comparing non-current liabilities with total capital employed.
Capital employed = share capital + reserves + non-current liabilities.
Non-current liabilities = $1.4 million; capital employed = $2.5 million.
Gearing = $1.4m ÷ $2.5m × 100 = 56%.
Using the textbook's broad guide, this is above the 50% dividing line and would be described as relatively highly geared.
Interest payments are contractual. If interest rates rise or cash flows weaken, a heavily borrowed business may find finance costs difficult to meet. High debt can also reduce the amount available for dividends.
A fast-growing business with stable cash flows may deliberately borrow to finance profitable expansion. Debt can allow growth without issuing more shares and diluting existing ownership.
Lower borrowing usually means lower exposure to interest-rate changes and lower fixed finance commitments.
Managers may be too cautious and could be missing profitable investment opportunities that could have been financed with sensible borrowing.
Investment ratios are mainly used by existing and potential shareholders. Investors can earn returns through dividend income and through a capital gain if the market price of their shares rises.
Usually expressed in cents or pence per share.
Compares dividend income with the price paid for a share.
Shows how many times profit covers the dividend payment.
Shows the amount of annual profit attributable to each share.
Shows how much investors are paying for each unit of annual earnings.
A company has profit for the year of $12 million, pays annual dividends of $4.8 million, has 24 million shares in issue, and its market price is $3.20 per share.
DPS = $4.8m ÷ 24m = $0.20.
Dividend yield = $0.20 ÷ $3.20 × 100 = 6.25%.
Dividend cover = $12m ÷ $4.8m = 2.5 times.
EPS = $12m ÷ 24m = $0.50.
P/E = $3.20 ÷ $0.50 = 6.4.
A higher DPS gives more cash income per share, but a business that pays out too much may retain too little for investment and future growth.
Useful when comparing dividend income with the price of the share. It can change because the dividend changes or simply because the market share price moves.
Higher cover means the dividend is more comfortably supported by current profits. The text gives around 2 times as a generally safe guide and below 1.5 as more risky, though profit stability matters.
A higher P/E often indicates stronger investor expectations of future earnings growth. Comparisons are most meaningful within the same industry and over time.
The textbook notes an approximate average P/E of 14–15, but P/E ratios vary substantially by industry, growth expectations, interest rates and investor sentiment. A high P/E is not automatically good and a low P/E is not automatically bad.
Sustained growth in profits can support higher dividends and may improve market confidence and the share price.
Raises cash income to shareholders but leaves less retained profit for future investment.
A company can use surplus cash to repurchase some of its shares. With fewer shares outstanding, measures such as EPS and DPS may increase, though the decision must be financially justified.
Some long-term investors may accept a lower dividend today if retained profit finances projects that raise future earnings and the share price.
Current ratio + acid test
ROCE, margins, inventory, receivables, payables
Gearing + shareholder ratios
Combine ratios. A company may have strong ROCE but weak liquidity; high dividend yield but low dividend cover; low gearing but slow growth. A balanced conclusion weighs several indicators and the business context.
Questions open in a pop-up. Each answer is marked immediately, with an explanation so you know why it is correct or incorrect.