Chapter 31 · Ratio Analysis
Calculate profitability and liquidity ratios, interpret their meaning and compare financial performance using worked examples.
Learning objectives
- Calculate and analyse gross profit margin, operating profit margin, mark-up, ROCE, current ratio and acid test ratio.
- Explain liquidity and the importance of meeting short-term financial obligations.
- Compare financial performance over time and between businesses, making justified judgments.
What Is Ratio Analysis?
The statement of comprehensive income tells us about revenue, expenses and profit over a period. The statement of financial position shows assets, liabilities and capital on a particular date. Although these figures are useful on their own, it is easier to assess financial performance by expressing one relevant figure in relation to another. This is called ratio analysis.
- Profitability ratios measure how effectively the business earns profit from its revenue or capital.
- Liquidity ratios measure how readily the business can meet its short-term debts, such as wages and bills owed to suppliers.
Ratios are especially valuable when comparing different years, businesses in the same industry, or actual results against expectations. However, one ratio alone rarely proves that a business is healthy: it helps identify questions that need further investigation.
Example: Orient Plus
Orient Plus manufactures high-quality children’s clothes. Following the arrival of a competitor, its business struggled. At the end of 2016 it announced that 12 of 32 design and production employees would be made redundant. The financial figures show deteriorating profitability and liquidity.
| Orient Plus | 2015 · US$ | 2016 · US$ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,231,500 | 890,600 |
| Gross profit | 897,400 | 588,500 |
| Operating profit | 273,100 | 57,400 |
| Profit after taxation | 158,600 | −2,400 |
Its net current assets fell from US$239,300 in 2015 to only US$14,300 in 2016. Its revenue also fell and operating profit shrank sharply, while the year ended with a small loss. Redundancies may reduce future wages, but they can also affect production capacity and staff morale. The example illustrates why managers should investigate both profitability and liquidity.
Gross Profit Margin
This ratio shows the proportion of revenue remaining after paying the cost of sales, before deducting overheads and other operating expenses. It helps assess pricing and direct production costs.
Ecohomes develops environmentally friendly homes. In 2016 its gross profit was US$11 million and its revenue was US$23.5 million. Gross profit margin = (11 ÷ 23.5) × 100 = 46.8% (one decimal place). In 2015 it was (8.3 ÷ 18.4) × 100 = 45.1%. Thus its margin improved by about 1.7 percentage points.
| Ecohomes (US$000) | 2015 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 18,400 | 23,500 |
| Cost of sales | 10,100 | 12,500 |
| Gross profit | 8,300 | 11,000 |
| Operating profit | 3,200 | 4,600 |
| Current assets | 11,900 | 13,600 |
| Inventories | 5,000 | 4,900 |
| Current liabilities | 7,800 | 8,700 |
| Capital employed | 18,000 | 20,000 |
A higher margin usually indicates greater gross profit for each unit of sales, perhaps because prices rose or direct costs were managed better. Margins differ by industry, so a supermarket selling large quantities may reasonably have a lower margin than a specialist producer. Higher revenue does not automatically mean a higher gross profit margin.
Operating Profit Margin
The operating profit margin measures what remains after cost of sales and the business’s operating expenses have been deducted. It is a useful indicator of how well a firm manages day-to-day costs.
For 2016, (US$4.6m ÷ US$23.5m) × 100 = 19.6% (19.5%, using its displayed rounding). For 2015, (US$3.2m ÷ US$18.4m) × 100 = 17.4%. Ecohomes appears to have controlled its operating expenses more effectively in 2016. The calculation uses the rounded figures given in the table.
Compare the gross margin with the operating margin. A large gap suggests that operating expenses absorb a substantial share of revenue. If the operating margin improves while the gross margin changes little, overhead control may have improved.
Example: Santos Metal Products
Santos Metal Products made scaffolding and metal components in Brazil. Demand rose during preparations for the 2016 Rio Olympics. The company’s 2010–2014 figures allow managers to investigate rising revenue alongside changing profit margins.
| Ratio | 2010 | 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| Gross profit margin | (4.9 ÷ 12.4) × 100 = 39.5% | (12.3 ÷ 24.1) × 100 = 51.0% |
| Operating profit margin | (1.0 ÷ 12.4) × 100 = 8.1% | (2.6 ÷ 24.1) × 100 = 10.8% |
Santos improved both margins, although operating expenses also rose. Increased orders may have allowed fixed costs to be spread over more sales, but these accounts alone do not prove precisely why the improvement occurred.
Check your understanding · Halfway
Answer each question before opening the suggested solution.
What is ratio analysis, and how do profitability and liquidity ratios differ?
Show suggested answer
Ratio analysis compares related financial figures. Profitability ratios assess earnings in relation to sales or capital. Liquidity ratios assess the ability to meet short-term debts.
Using Ecohomes’ 2016 figures (revenue US$23.5m and gross profit US$11m), calculate its gross profit margin.
Show suggested answer
(11 ÷ 23.5) × 100 = 46.8%. This means Ecohomes earned about 46.8 cents of gross profit for each US$1 of revenue before operating expenses.
Santos Metal Products recorded operating profit of BRL2.6m on revenue of BRL24.1m in 2014. Calculate its operating profit margin.
Show suggested answer
(2.6 ÷ 24.1) × 100 = 10.8% to one decimal place.
A property costs US$200,000 and sells for US$236,000. Calculate (a) the mark-up and (b) the gross profit margin. Why do they differ?
Show suggested answer
Profit = 36,000. Mark-up = 36,000 ÷ 200,000 × 100 = 18%; gross profit margin = 36,000 ÷ 236,000 × 100 ≈ 15.3%. The first uses cost as its denominator and the second uses sales revenue.
Describe why a business can make a profit but still struggle to pay suppliers. Use Orient Plus if helpful.
Show suggested answer
Profit is an accounting measure and is not necessarily held as available cash. Money may be tied up in inventories or amounts owed by customers. Orient Plus had very low net current assets in 2016 despite still reporting positive operating profit.
Ecohomes had current assets of US$13.6m and current liabilities of US$8.7m. Calculate the current ratio and briefly interpret it.
Show suggested answer
13.6 ÷ 8.7 = 1.56:1. The business has approximately US$1.56 of current assets for every US$1 of short-term liabilities; this suggests some cover, but the quality and availability of assets also matter.
Mark-up
Some businesses calculate profit relative to the cost of an individual item, rather than relative to the selling price. This is the mark-up. It is particularly useful when setting selling prices.
A property costs US$200,000 to build and sells for US$236,000. Profit per property = 236,000 − 200,000 = US$36,000. Mark-up = (36,000 ÷ 200,000) × 100 = 18%.
If Ecohomes aims for a 25% mark-up on a property costing US$200,000, selling price = 200,000 + (200,000 × 25%) = US$250,000.
Do not confuse mark-up with gross profit margin. Mark-up divides profit by cost; gross profit margin divides gross profit by sales revenue. In the US$236,000 example, the 18% mark-up corresponds to a gross profit margin of about 15.3% (36,000 ÷ 236,000 × 100).
Concept and Importance of Liquidity
A business may own valuable property or machinery and still have problems paying suppliers this week. Buildings and specialist equipment can take a long time to sell, while cash can be used immediately. Trade receivables can become cash when customers pay their bills, whereas inventories are often less liquid because the business first needs to sell them.
- Cash: immediately available to pay bills.
- Trade receivables: amounts due from customers, usually expected to be collected within the agreed credit period.
- Inventories: goods held for use or sale; converting these to cash is less certain.
- Non-current assets: often difficult to sell quickly without disrupting operations.
Insufficient liquidity can prevent a business paying wages, rent or suppliers despite reporting a profit. The current ratio and acid test ratio use current assets and current liabilities to assess short-term financial strength.
Current Ratio
This compares all current assets with amounts payable within the next year. The higher the current ratio, the greater the apparent short-term asset cover, although holding too many idle assets may be inefficient.
2016: US$13.6m ÷ US$8.7m = 1.56:1. 2015: US$11.9m ÷ US$7.8m = 1.53:1. The ratio improved slightly. A current ratio between approximately 1.5 and 2 is often regarded as comfortable, but no single range suits every business.
A low ratio might mean insufficient working capital. A very high ratio might mean cash is lying idle or stock is building up. Evaluate it alongside the industry, inventory levels, customer payment terms and cash forecasts.
Acid Test Ratio
The acid test ratio is stricter than the current ratio because it excludes inventories, which may take time to sell or may lose value. It measures the cover offered by more readily available current assets.
2016: (13.6 − 4.9) ÷ 8.7 = 1.00:1. 2015: (11.9 − 5.0) ÷ 7.8 = 0.88:1. The ratio improved from 0.88 to 1, suggesting the company became better able to cover immediate debts without relying on selling stock.
An acid test ratio of less than 1 may suggest a liquidity risk, but the significance depends on the business. A retailer collecting cash immediately may operate effectively with a lower ratio than a manufacturer allowing customers to pay later.
Example: Comparing Assets and Liabilities
Patel’s, a car dealership with more than 60 outlets in India, and UZZY Plastics, which manufactures polythene products. These examples show how ratios make two very different sets of figures easier to interpret.
| Company and year | Current ratio | Acid test ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Patel’s 2015 | 131,174 ÷ 136,531 = 0.96:1 | 49,615 ÷ 136,531 = 0.36:1 |
| Patel’s 2016 | 62,555 ÷ 53,757 = 1.16:1 | 20,074 ÷ 53,757 = 0.37:1 |
| UZZY Plastics 2015 | 119,400 ÷ 75,500 = 1.58:1 | 64,100 ÷ 75,500 = 0.85:1 |
| UZZY Plastics 2016 | 120,000 ÷ 68,300 = 1.76:1 | 60,500 ÷ 68,300 = 0.89:1 |
UZZY Plastics appears more liquid on both measures in both years. However, it is important to consider how car dealerships and plastics manufacturers manage inventories and payment schedules differently before drawing a final conclusion.
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
ROCE compares the operating profit generated with the amount of long-term finance used by the business. It shows how effectively the firm uses capital invested in its operations. Capital employed may be calculated as capital and reserves plus non-current liabilities if no direct figure is supplied.
2016: (US$4.6m ÷ US$20m) × 100 = 23%. 2015: (US$3.2m ÷ US$18m) × 100 = 17.8%. This indicates that Ecohomes earned more operating profit per unit of capital in 2016. A stronger ROCE is usually favourable, though the appropriate figure varies between industries.
ROCE is valuable when comparing investment alternatives or the same firm over several years. However, business investment carries more risk than holding savings in a bank, so a high ROCE is not a guarantee of a risk-free return.
Using Ratios to Make Comparisons
Ratios make the performance and financial position of different years easier to compare because they standardise results. A larger firm may have more total profit but not necessarily a higher percentage return. Ratio trends can highlight improvements, problems and areas requiring management action.
- Year-on-year comparison: Is a company controlling operating costs more effectively than last year? Has its liquidity improved?
- Inter-business comparison: Compare ratios for businesses operating in similar markets, with comparable accounting methods.
- Context: Look for changes in product mix, investment, market conditions and exceptional expenses before drawing conclusions.
For 2015, reported operating profit margins were 6.8% for Ford and 5.0% for Honda in 2015. This suggests Ford earned more operating profit per unit of sales, but differences in product lines, R&D spending and new-model launches may also affect the comparison.
Example: Al-Dhabit Shipping
Al-Dhabit Shipping, a family-owned business in Oman, transported oil. In 2014 a sharp fall in oil prices reduced demand for its services. The family invested US$2 million to help the business survive. Its 2013–2015 figures allow us to analyse the recovery.
| Al-Dhabit (US$ million) | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 12.50 | 9.60 | 11.90 |
| Operating profit | 1.13 | 0.34 | 1.17 |
| Current assets | 3.21 | 2.59 | 3.99 |
| Current liabilities | 2.16 | 2.55 | 2.43 |
| Capital employed | 10 | 12 | 12 |
| Ratio | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating profit margin | 9.04% | 3.54% | 9.83% |
| Current ratio | 1.49:1 | 1.02:1 | 1.64:1 |
| ROCE | 11.30% | 2.83% | 9.75% |
The 2014 deterioration is clear in profitability and liquidity. By 2015 the operating profit margin and current ratio had recovered beyond their 2013 values, but ROCE at 9.75% remained below the 2013 level of 11.30%. Revenue was also still below its 2013 level. The overall assessment should therefore be a qualified recovery, not a claim of complete improvement.
Large vs Small Businesses
Large businesses often have specialist finance teams that analyse ratios for managers and shareholders. Smaller business owners may not prepare detailed annual accounts or may be unfamiliar with ratio analysis, although they can still use the same methods.
- Large businesses: more published financial information, specialist staff and greater need to report performance to shareholders or other stakeholders.
- Small businesses: owners may focus first on cash, cost control, profit margins and day-to-day survival, although ratio analysis can help them judge pricing and short-term liquidity.
- Both: can compare their own results across years and use ratios to identify trends, but must interpret results in the context of their business.
Ratios are tools for judgment, not answers by themselves. Managers should combine them with other information such as changes in demand, loan commitments, inventory turnover and forecasts.
End-of-chapter questions
Answer each question before opening the suggested solution.
State the formulas for gross profit margin, operating profit margin, mark-up and ROCE.
Show suggested answer
Gross profit margin = Gross profit ÷ Revenue × 100; operating profit margin = Operating profit ÷ Revenue × 100; mark-up = Profit per item ÷ Cost per item × 100; ROCE = Operating profit ÷ Capital employed × 100.
Using Ecohomes’ 2015 and 2016 accounts, calculate the acid test ratio in both years and explain the direction of change.
Show suggested answer
2015: (11.9 − 5.0) ÷ 7.8 = 0.88:1. 2016: (13.6 − 4.9) ÷ 8.7 = 1.00:1. The ratio improved, suggesting greater short-term asset cover excluding inventories.
Calculate Ecohomes’ ROCE for 2015 (operating profit US$3.2m, capital employed US$18m) and 2016 (US$4.6m and US$20m).
Show suggested answer
2015: 3.2 ÷ 18 × 100 = 17.8%. 2016: 4.6 ÷ 20 × 100 = 23.0%. Its return on the capital used increased.
A shop buys an item for US$80 and sets a 25% mark-up. Calculate the selling price and gross profit margin.
Show suggested answer
Selling price = 80 × 1.25 = US$100. Profit = US$20. Gross profit margin = 20 ÷ 100 × 100 = 20%.
Compare the 2016 current and acid test ratios of Patel’s and UZZY Plastics. Which appears more liquid?
Show suggested answer
Patel’s: current 1.16:1; acid test 0.37:1. UZZY: current 1.76:1; acid test 0.89:1. UZZY appears more liquid on both ratios, although inventory practices and sector differences matter.
Why is the acid test ratio generally lower than the current ratio?
Show suggested answer
The acid test ratio removes inventories from current assets, recognising that stock may be difficult to convert into cash immediately. Therefore the numerator is smaller or equal to that of the current ratio.
Calculate Al-Dhabit Shipping’s operating profit margin for 2014 using operating profit US$0.34m and revenue US$9.6m.
Show suggested answer
0.34 ÷ 9.6 × 100 = 3.54% (approximately 3.5% to one decimal place). This is much lower than its 2013 result.
For Al-Dhabit Shipping, calculate the 2015 current ratio and ROCE (current assets US$3.99m, liabilities US$2.43m, operating profit US$1.17m, capital employed US$12m).
Show suggested answer
Current ratio = 3.99 ÷ 2.43 = 1.64:1. ROCE = 1.17 ÷ 12 × 100 = 9.75%.
Explain two reasons for using ratio analysis to compare businesses, and two reasons why care is required.
Show suggested answer
Benefits: ratios make results comparable despite differences in business size, and reveal strengths, weaknesses and trends. Cautions: industry/business models differ; and ratios reflect historical data or different accounting choices, so context is essential.
Explain why operating profit margin can rise even if gross profit margin does not change.
Show suggested answer
The business may reduce operating expenses, such as administration or distribution costs, while its gross profit relative to sales remains unchanged. Operating margin thus rises due to improved overhead control.
Assess Al-Dhabit Shipping’s performance from 2013 to 2015 using the three ratios and give a supported final judgment.
Show suggested answer
Its operating margin fell from 9.04% in 2013 to 3.54% in 2014, then recovered to 9.83% in 2015. Current ratio fell from 1.49:1 to 1.02:1, then rose to 1.64:1. ROCE recovered from 2.83% in 2014 to 9.75% in 2015 but remained below 2013’s 11.30%. Judgment: recovery was substantial but not complete; revenue had not fully returned to its 2013 level, and ratio analysis alone cannot explain all risks.
Chapter 31 recap
Gross profit margin = Gross profit ÷ Revenue × 100; operating profit margin = Operating profit ÷ Revenue × 100; mark-up = Profit per item ÷ Cost per item × 100; ROCE = Operating profit ÷ Capital employed × 100. For liquidity, current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities and acid test = (Current assets − Inventories) ÷ Current liabilities. Compare ratios over time and with similar businesses, but always explain the business context.
Source reference: Pearson Edexcel International GCSE Business (9–1), Chapter 31. Historical figures are included for educational illustration. IGCSE360 is an independent learning website and is not affiliated with Pearson.
